lib/linux-firefox/browser/chrome/icons/default/default16.png.lib/linux-firefox/browser/blocklist.xml.WWW: SVNWeb : git : Homepage pkg-plist: as obtained via: make generate-plist Expand this list (60 items) Collapse this list. This is a pre-compiled Linux/i386 version, able to run plugins from that Maintainer: Port Added: 21:52:41 Last Update: 06:13:39 SVN Revision: 454665 People watching this port, also watch:: firefox, mplayer Also Listed In: ipv6 linux License: not specified in port Description: Firefox is an award winning, free, open-source web browser for many platformsĪnd is based on the Mozilla codebase. Linux-firefox Web browser based on the browser portion of MozillaĤ5.9.0,2 www =27 Version of this port present on the latest quarterly branch. This is not a primary server, but it used for development.Ĭommit processing is paused while the homepage correction script runs.
#Firefox esr 10.0.6 free#
Want a good read? Try FreeBSD Mastery: Jails (IT Mastery Book 15)įreshPorts needs to find a new hosting provide willing to take a 2U chassis and host it free of charge. You should stick with FEATURES="protect-owned".Īt the very least, the latest 10.x ESR (currently 10.0.11) should be stable otherwise all the security bugs that these ESR bumps have fixed won't reach stable users. > Please post the output of `emerge genlop & genlop firefox-bin`.ĭo you by chance have FEATURES="collision-protect" enabled? This feature makes upgrades of certain versions of packages collide with themselves, and is not supported by default. > Which versions of firefox-bin did you have before? > It's hard to reproduce and or block anything when we don't know the other > Hmm, perhaps x86 could use some stabilization, upstream is at 17.x. Please post the output of `emerge genlop & genlop firefox-bin`. Which versions of firefox-bin did you have before? It's hard to reproduce and or block anything when we don't know the other package. >to your elog messages for the whole content of the above message. >forbidden by PMS section 13.4 (see bug #326685). >more collisions between symlinks and directories, which is explicitly >None of the installed packages claim the file(s). >Searching all installed packages for file collisions. >a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message. >a bug report at unless you report exactly which >information to determine if a real problem exists. >then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough >If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came from
#Firefox esr 10.0.6 install#
>least two or more packages that are known to install the same file(s). A bug report is only useful if it identifies at If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do >owners / ` to identify the installed package that owns a >This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other
>symlinks and directories, which is explicitly forbidden by PMS section >Package 'has one or more collisions between The first two warnings can be reported upstream, Gentoo won't deal with them although they might already have been fixed since upstream is at 17.x. > issues directly to the upstream developers of this software. > Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA
> /var/tmp/portage/warning: the address of 'flags' will always evaluate as 'true' > QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it /././dist/include/nsBaseHashtable.h:150:14: warning: converting to non-pointer type 'unsigned int' from NULL >QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it
0 kommentar(er)
